|
Energy-efficient technologies were not a
major consideration for plants built in the first half of the century. Today,
managers of these older facilities face ongoing challenges in determining the
best combination of methods for reducing energy costs. For Great Lakes Steel, a
computerized insulation/energy analysis program helped provide answers and
significant cost savings.
THE FACILITY Located in
Ecorse, Mich., Great Lakes Steel produces steel used primarily by the automobile
industry. The company operates three boiler rooms from a single location; the
two oldest were built in 1936 and 1951. These boilers supply high-pressure
steam for the iron-making facility. Heat and energy were obviously being lost
in many areas of the plants. This was especially true in the boiler rooms which
suffered from a combination of high heat and moisture, older, inefficient
machinery, and uninsulated or underinsulated pipes and equipment. Hot equipment
surfaces presented additional concerns for worker safety.
THE OPPORTUNITY Great Lakes
management recognized the need for improvements and began considering the best
ways to achieve its goals in productivity, process control, energy savings and
safety. The company chose the boiler rooms in each of the older plants as
priority areas. According to Great Lakes Process Maintenance Manager Tim
Weinschenker, "We wanted to tune up the entire package."
Along with mechanical improvements to
equipment, Weinschenker and his team considered the use of insulation. For
definitive answers on their insulation needs, and potential cost and energy
savings, they took advantage of an innovative energy/insulation analysis
capability developed by the North American Insulation Manufacturers Association
(NAIMA) and offered by 3i Supply, a local supplier and fabricator of insulation
products and services.
THE ANALYSIS NAIMA's program,
titled 3E Plus®, is a software system designed to help save dollars, Btus,
and pounds of CO2 emissions. The system calculates energy loss on
uninsulated pipes, tanks and equipment, calculates the dollar value of that
energy loss and then provides a detailed analysis of potential energy and dollar
savings when those same areas are insulated.
3i Supply conducted the analysis for Great
Lakes Steel, taking two weeks to gather the detailed information needed. Two
boiler rooms, each housing five boilers, were included in the analysis. 3i
Supply technicians surveyed pipes, valves, flanges, turbines, and removable
surfaces. They physically inspected each area, measured the exact dimensions of
pipe and flat surface areas, and recorded temperatures using a probe.
ENERGY
SAVING PROGRAM ·
Analysis Summary*
Boiler House No.2, Boiler No. 1 |
| ITEM |
TEMP °F |
DESCRIPTION |
QTY |
UNIT OF MEAS. |
BTU LOSS/YR |
TOTAL BTU LOSS/YR |
COST PER UNIT |
TOTAL $$ LOST/YR |
| 1 |
500 |
22" Flange Valve |
16.5
|
SQ/FT |
1670 |
27555 |
$38.58 |
$636.57 |
| 2 |
500 |
10" Iron Pipe |
2 |
LF |
4463 |
8926 |
$103.13 |
$206.26 |
| 3 |
450 |
8" Iron Pipe |
5 |
LF |
1350 |
6750 |
$83.26 |
$416.30 |
| 4 |
450 |
4" Flange Valve |
28
|
SQ/FT |
1350 |
37800 |
$31.19 |
$873.32 |
| 5 |
500 |
6" Iron Pipe |
27 |
LF |
2828 |
76356 |
$65.34 |
$1,764.18 |
| 6 |
500 |
4" Iron Pipe |
6 |
LF |
1965 |
11790 |
$45.41 |
$272.46 |
| 7 |
400 |
4" Flange Valve |
42
|
SQ/FT |
1071 |
44982 |
$24.73 |
$1,038.66 |
| 8 |
460 |
Large Turbine |
24
|
SQ/FT |
1350 |
32400 |
$31.19 |
$748.56 |
| 9 |
350 |
69" x 24" Flat
Surface |
138
|
SQ/FT |
827 |
114126 |
$19.11 |
$2,637.18 |
| 10 |
350 |
Flange Valve |
34.8
|
SQ/FT |
827 |
28779.6 |
$19.11 |
$665.03 |
| 11 |
350 |
Small Turbine |
10
|
SQ/FT |
827 |
8270 |
$19.11 |
$191.10 |
| 12 |
350 |
Fl Sur Basement |
108
|
SQ/FT |
827 |
89316 |
$19.11 |
$2,063.88 |
| 13 |
325 |
8" Iron Pipe |
9 |
LF |
1791 |
16119 |
$41.37 |
$372.33 |
| 14 |
325 |
14" Flange Valve |
8.7
|
SQ/FT |
718 |
6246.6 |
$16.59 |
$144.33 |
| 15 |
300 |
10" Dia. FLG5 |
14.22
|
SQ/FT |
617 |
8773.74 |
$14.24 |
$202.49 |
| 16 |
300 |
1" Iron Pipe |
130
|
LF |
235 |
30550 |
$5.43 |
$705.90 |
| 17 |
200 |
8" Iron Pipe |
254 |
LF |
607 |
154178 |
$14.01 |
$3,558.54 |
| 18 |
200 |
6" Iron Pipe |
287
|
LF |
475 |
136325 |
$10.98 |
$3,151.26 |
| 19 |
200 |
1 1/2" Iron Pipe |
77 |
LF |
136 |
10472 |
$3.15 |
$242.55 |
| Total
BTU Loss/Year: 849,719.40 |
Total $$
Loss/Year: $19,891 |
| *The
information presented here is a summary of the analysis conducted by 3i Supply
using the 3E Plus® program. The complete analysis included extensive energy
and financial data including type of fuel and insulation currently used, annual
operating hours of the equipment, current and anticipated fuel costs and tax
rates and other critical data. |
A broad range of other energy and
financial data was also gathered. This information included the type of fuel
currently used, annual operating hours of the equipment, current and anticipated
fuel costs and tax rates, and other data critical to a sound, realistic
analysis.
From the information provided, 3i Supply
used the 3E Plus® program to produce a detailed analysis of where energy and
dollars were being lost on each of the ten boilers. For each individual
application, the program provided an analysis summary which included the
following:
- The size of the item/equipment
- Btus lost per foot
- Total Btus lost per year
- Cost per Btu
- Total dollar loss per year
The report also provided a detailed
listing and summary of savings in those same areas when the minimum thickness of
insulation was installed. The report itemized savings in Btus and dollars, per
item and annually.
On just one boiler, the analysis showed
that the plant was losing a total of approximately 850,000 Btus hourly , at a
cost of approximately $20,000 annually. By insulating that one boiler, the
analysis showed that the plant could save 800,000 Btus hourly for a total annual
cost savings of approximately $17,000.
With each boiler house incorporating five
boilers, the potential savings were even more significant. For example, the 3i
Supply analysis for all boilers in Boiler House No. 2 estimated total energy
dollars lost at approximately $84,000. By insulating all items analyzed for
Boiler House No. 2, the analysis showed potential annual saving of $74,000.
Similar dollars lost/saved figures were estimated for Boiler House No. 1.
To realize the energy and cost savings
suggested by the analysis, 3i Supply recommended a combination of removable
insulation covers, fiber glass, foamglass and mineral wool insulations.
Plus® Program |
Industrial process engineers,
environmental managers and others charged with improving their facility energy
package are discovering that compared to many "big ticket" items,
insulation is a technology that doesn't cost much to install, yet yields a very
large payback over the life of the facility. The North American Insulation
Manufacturers Association's 3E Plus® software program makes it easy to
determine current areas of energy loss, and the dollars and energy that can be
saved by insulating.
Beyond basic dollar savings, the 3E Plus®
program also helps managers calculate and select the insulation thickness needed
to reduce heat loss or heat gain, maintain a safe insulated surface temperature
for personnel protection and improve condensation control. |
Once data is gathered and entered, 3E Plus®
calculations can be done with a few simple key strokes.
The 3E Plus® program software is
available free from NAIMA, or it can be downloaded from the Internet. For a
copy of the software or for additional information, call NAIMA at 703-684-0084.
The program can be downloaded from the
Department of Energy's website www.oit.doe.gov
and through www.pipeinsulation.org. |
THE RESULTS Great Lakes Steel
has installed insulation in many of the areas highlighted in the
energy/insulation analysis. Not all recommendations were acted upon, however,
due to the need to apply dollars to other forms of energy upgrades. "We
looked at insulation as part of our overall energy improvement plan," notes
Tim Weinschenker. "We had to make decisions on where our dollars were best
spent on mechanical improvements to equipment and where insulation provided the
best answer. For example, it doesn't do any good to have a pipe insulated if
you don't have steam going through it."
According to Weinschenker, priority was
given to insulating areas that provided both cost and safety benefits, as well
as to areas of significantly high energy loss. "We went ahead with any
place where the use of removable insulation could be utilized, especially the
handhold plates that provide access into the boiler tube. We insulated all five
of the ID fan turbines. And we did a lot of insulating on the boilers and feed
water pumps, as well as the hot pipes in the feed pump area."
ENERGY SAVING PROGRAM ·
Savings Summary
Boiler House No.2, Boiler No. 1 |
| ITEM |
TEMP °F |
DESCRIPTION |
QTY |
BTU SAVED |
TOTAL BTU |
UNIT $$ SAVED |
TOTAL $$ SAVED |
| 1 |
500 |
22" Flange Valve |
16.5
SQ/FT |
1570 |
25905 |
$35.43 |
$584.60 |
| 2 |
500 |
10" Iron Pipe |
2 LF |
4190 |
8380 |
$95.00 |
$190.00 |
| 3 |
450 |
8" Iron Pipe |
5 LF |
1215 |
6075 |
$76.00 |
$380.00 |
| 4 |
450 |
4" Flange Valve |
28 SQ/FT |
1215 |
34020 |
$23.19 |
$649.32 |
| 5 |
500 |
6" Iron Pipe |
27 LF |
2584 |
69768 |
$59.00 |
$1,593.00 |
| 6 |
500 |
4" Iron Pipe |
6 LF |
1869 |
11214 |
$48.90 |
$293.40 |
| 7 |
400 |
4" Flange Valve |
42 SQ/FT |
1039 |
43638 |
$22.70 |
$953.40 |
| 8 |
460 |
Large Turbine |
24 SQ/FT |
1318 |
31632 |
$29.01 |
$696.24 |
| 9 |
350 |
69" x 24" Flat
Surface |
138 SQ/FT |
798 |
110124 |
$17.28 |
$2,384.64 |
| 10 |
350 |
Flange Valve |
34.8
SQ/FT |
798 |
27770.4 |
$17.28 |
$601.34 |
| 11 |
350 |
Small Turbine |
10 SQ/FT |
798 |
7980 |
$17.28 |
$172.80 |
| 12 |
350 |
Fl Sur Basement |
108 SQ/FT |
798 |
86184 |
$17.28 |
$1,866.24 |
| 13 |
325 |
8" Iron Pipe |
9 LF |
1698 |
15282 |
$38.37 |
$345.33 |
| 14 |
325 |
14" Flange Valve |
8.7 SQ/FT |
692 |
6020.4 |
$14.83 |
$129.02 |
| 15 |
300 |
10" Dia. FLG5 |
14.22
SQ/FT |
589 |
8375.58 |
$15.92 |
$226.38 |
| 16 |
300 |
1" Iron Pipe |
130 LF |
204 |
26520 |
$4.10 |
$533.00 |
| 17 |
200 |
8" Iron Pipe |
254 LF |
568 |
144272 |
$11.26 |
$2,860.04 |
| 18 |
200 |
6" Iron Pipe |
287 LF |
436 |
125132 |
$8.80 |
$2,525.60 |
| 19 |
200 |
1 1/2" Iron Pipe |
77 LF |
102 |
7854 |
$1.74 |
$133.98 |
| Total BTU Saved/Year: 796, 146 |
Total $$
Saved/Year: $17,118.33 (vs.
equipment remaining uninsulated) |
COST SAVINGS Great Lakes Steel estimates that
the improvements made to date, including insulation and mechanical improvements,
have resulted in annual energy cost savings of approximately $160,000. Over a
15-year period, the expected life of the insulation, savings are expected to
total close to $2.4 million. As future enhancements are considered, the
analysis provided through the 3E Plus® program will provide the company with
a precise road map for capturing additional energy and dollar savings.
For additional information, contact Tim
Weinschenker, Great Lakes Steel, Ecorse, Mich., at 313-297-3527 or (fax)
313-297-3498. Tim's been with Great Lakes Steel for 22 years holding various
positions in utilities and energy management. |